Observability refers to the ability to understand the internal state of a system based on the data it produces. It stems from control theory and plays a critical role in modern software engineering, enabling teams to effectively diagnose and address issues within complex, distributed systems.
As systems grow in complexity, monitoring alone is often insufficient. Observability provides insights and enables a proactive approach to system reliability and performance. Unlike traditional monitoring, which relies heavily on predefined metrics or alerts, observability links together logs, metrics, and traces to offer a comprehensive view of a system’s behavior.
This holistic approach helps developers and operators pinpoint root causes faster and simplify operational workflows. Achieving this requires the integration of processes, tools, and cultural practices that prioritize transparency and in-depth understanding of system performance.
In this article
Metrics are numerical data points that reflect the behavior and performance of a system over time. They provide insights into resource utilization, application performance, and overall system health. Common examples include CPU usage, memory consumption, request latency, and error rates.
Metrics are typically structured and easy to aggregate, making them well-suited for trend analysis and real-time alerting. However, metrics alone may not always reveal why an issue occurred. While they indicate that something is wrong, they often lack detailed context. Observability bridges this gap by incorporating metrics with other data types.
Logs are immutable, timestamped records of events that occur within a system. They offer detailed, unstructured insights into actions, errors, or interactions. Logs are especially useful for diagnosing complex problems or understanding the sequence of events leading up to an issue.
However, analyzing logs efficiently can become challenging as system complexity and log volume increase. This is where observability tools come into play, integrating logs with metrics and traces to provide deeper insights and make analysis more manageable and actionable.
Traces track the life cycle of requests as they traverse through a distributed system. They provide visibility into how requests interact with different services, highlighting bottlenecks, latencies, and potential failure points. With tracing, teams can visualize dependencies and understand the flow of data across microservices or APIs.
Traces are particularly valuable for diagnosing performance issues in distributed systems, where identifying the root cause is often difficult. In combination with metrics and logs, traces create a unified view of system operations, enabling more effective troubleshooting and optimization.
Events represent individual occurrences within a system, such as deployment changes, configuration updates, or failures. Unlike logs, which are often verbose and granular, events focus on system-level activities that can act as context for analysis. When integrated with other observability data types, events provide the “why” behind issues or performance changes.
Event data is especially useful for correlation with metrics and traces, as it can explain anomalies or deviations in behavior. For example, a spike in latency might correspond with a deployment event, indicating a causal relationship. Properly leveraging event data improves decision-making and fosters faster problem resolution.
Monitoring focuses on collecting and alerting based on predefined sets of known issues. It typically answers questions like “Is the system up?” or “Is latency within acceptable thresholds?” Monitoring tools rely on static dashboards, rules, and alarms that trigger when specified conditions are met.
Observability is about enabling deeper investigation without prior knowledge of possible failure modes. It provides the flexibility to explore unknown issues by correlating metrics, logs, traces, and events. Instead of relying solely on alerts, observability empowers teams to ask open-ended questions about system behavior and get meaningful answers.
Monitoring indicates when something is wrong, while observability helps teams understand why it is happening. Monitoring is reactive; observability is proactive. Both are critical for system reliability, but observability becomes increasingly important as architectures become more distributed and complex.
Observability tools collect, process, and correlate telemetry data — metrics, logs, traces, and events — from different parts of a system to create a detailed picture of its internal state.
The first step involves instrumenting applications, infrastructure, and networks to emit telemetry data. This is done either manually, by embedding libraries and SDKs, or automatically through agents and sidecars. Modern observability tools support various collection methods, including open standards like OpenTelemetry.
Collected data is streamed to centralized platforms where it is aggregated and stored. Metrics are usually stored in time-series databases, logs in log management systems, and traces in distributed tracing backends. These platforms ensure data can be queried efficiently, even at high volume and scale.
The next critical step is correlating different data types to establish context. Observability tools link logs, metrics, traces, and events based on identifiers such as request IDs or timestamps. This correlation enables users to move seamlessly from high-level system indicators down to specific error logs or trace paths.
Once data is contextualized, observability platforms provide dashboards, visualizations, and analytic tools. These allow teams to detect anomalies, monitor system health, and explore performance bottlenecks. Advanced tools also offer root cause analysis, predictive insights through machine learning, and automation for common remediation workflows.
Observability tools often integrate with alerting systems to notify teams of critical issues. Instead of static thresholds, they can trigger alerts based on dynamic baselines, anomaly detection, or complex, multi-dimensional conditions, ensuring that alerts are meaningful and actionable.
By automating data collection, providing deep correlation across telemetry types, and delivering actionable insights, observability tools equip teams to diagnose issues quickly, optimize performance, and maintain resilient systems.
Observability offers significant advantages for managing and improving modern software systems. These benefits include:
One of the major challenges in achieving effective observability is the existence of data silos across teams, services, or platforms. When telemetry data — metrics, logs, traces, and events — is scattered across disconnected tools or systems, it becomes difficult to build a coherent view of the overall system state. Fragmentation slows down incident response and leads to blind spots where critical issues can go unnoticed.
Modern systems generate vast amounts of telemetry data with high cardinality — the presence of many unique values in a dataset, such as user IDs or session IDs. High cardinality increases the complexity and cost of storing, indexing, and querying data. It can overwhelm observability platforms, leading to degraded performance, slower queries, and escalating storage costs.
Adding telemetry to applications manually — inserting code to generate metrics, logs, and traces — can be a time-consuming and error-prone process. Developers must consistently follow instrumentation practices across diverse codebases and services, which increases the risk of incomplete or inconsistent observability coverage. Manual instrumentation can also slow down development cycles.
As organizations scale their observability efforts, they often adopt multiple specialized tools for monitoring, logging, tracing, and analysis. However, managing a sprawling toolchain creates operational complexity, increases costs, and leads to fragmented insights. It can also cause duplication of efforts and confusion among teams.
Organizations should consider these practices when building an observability pipeline.
Building observability without defined goals often results in excessive, unfocused data collection. To be effective, teams must first articulate what they aim to achieve with observability.
This involves identifying critical business and technical metrics that reflect system health and user experience.
Objectives might include minimizing downtime, reducing incident resolution time, improving customer satisfaction, or detecting anomalies early. KPIs like service availability (e.g., 99.99% uptime), latency thresholds, MTTD, MTTR, and deployment success rates should be chosen based on these objectives.
Setting measurable goals also enables teams to prioritize telemetry coverage for the most critical systems first. Instead of collecting everything indiscriminately, teams focus on data that supports key questions like “How fast are user requests processed?” or “Where do failures cluster during high load?”
A unified data model allows different telemetry types to work together seamlessly, enabling efficient cross-analysis and root cause identification. Without standardization, metrics might use one format, logs another, and traces yet another, making correlation slow and error-prone.
A unified model ensures that critical metadata, such as request IDs, timestamps, service names, and environment labels, are consistently included across all telemetry. This model should define key fields, relationships between entities, and data formats, making it easier to automate queries, build coherent dashboards, and troubleshoot multi-service transactions.
Standards like OpenTelemetry and the W3C Trace Context provide frameworks for achieving interoperability, reducing the cost of maintaining custom data translation layers between systems.
Manual telemetry insertion is not only labor-intensive but also error-prone, especially in large-scale or rapidly evolving systems. Gaps in coverage or inconsistent logging practices can severely impair observability during critical incidents.
Automating instrumentation using libraries, SDKs, or agents ensures complete and standardized telemetry coverage across services. Technologies like service meshes (e.g., Istio) or observability platforms with automatic tracing capabilities help capture essential data without requiring deep code changes.
Where manual instrumentation is necessary — for example, to add custom business logic spans or application-specific metrics — teams should adopt clear coding standards, reusable templates, and automation scripts to minimize inconsistencies and simplify implementation.
Observability should be directly connected to incident detection, management, and resolution workflows to maximize operational impact. This integration starts with configuring telemetry systems to trigger intelligent, actionable alerts based on real-time analysis of metrics, logs, and traces.
Alerts should feed into incident management platforms (e.g., PagerDuty, Opsgenie, or ServiceNow) with contextual links to dashboards and relevant traces or logs. Post-incident reviews should include telemetry-driven analyses to reconstruct event timelines and identify root causes.
Embedding observability data into incident retrospectives allows organizations to extract lessons learned, refine detection rules, and improve automation for future incidents.
By tightly coupling observability with incident response, teams shorten investigation cycles, reduce downtime, and improve their ability to respond to complex failures.
A static observability setup quickly becomes outdated as systems evolve, new services are added, and user expectations shift. Teams should establish regular cadences — such as quarterly reviews — to assess the effectiveness of their observability infrastructure.
Key activities include reviewing telemetry coverage for new services, updating dashboards and alerting conditions, re-evaluating KPIs against business needs, and pruning redundant or low-value data sources. Continuous improvement also involves incorporating feedback from engineering teams, on-call rotations, and post-incident analyses.
Investments in automation, better data correlation methods, and new visualization techniques should be driven by observed pain points or gaps. Organizations should stay informed about emerging observability technologies and best practices, adopting innovations that can reduce operational overhead, improve insights, and strengthen system resilience over time.
Lumigo is cloud native observability tool that provides automated distributed tracing of microservice applications and supports OpenTelemetry for reporting of tracing data and resources. With Lumigo, users can:
Get started with a free trial of Lumigo for your microservice applications
